upside-down

Upside-down The criminal expert and Delma lawyer Gamma, that also was contracted by the defense of the couple Alexander Nardoni and Anna Carolina Jatobá, affirmed in interview in this monday that Isabella was launched upside-down by the screen of the window. According to it, the marks left in the dirt of the wall of the building had been made by one of the legs of Isabella, and not for one of the hands. " This body was not launched as it is here (pointing with respect to a croquis that integrates the finding). " was launched upside-down; , it said. The justification would be amplitude that reaches the legs in relations to the esfregoes in the wall of the building and a nugget of blood in the sill of the window. In accordance with it, the finding not test that the mark of shoe in the sheet of the room of where Isabella was hurled is of the sandal of Alexander Nardoni. Delma Gamma criticized the fact of the skill not to have carried through a survey of digital in all objects of the house. " In the finding, the connoisseurs say that, when arriving in the place, he had a clutter characterizing routine habits of the couple, that live in the garbage. How they can affirm this? They lived with the couple? They had the obligation to make the survey of the fingerprints in objects revirados in the apartment and spoon the biological material for analyses comparatives" , she insisted. Delma Gamma affirmed, categorically, that it found the way operandis and the motivation of the crime. " I cannot only say now therefore I did not finish to study findings" , it standed out. According to it, the screen was cut to play some object that would be deducted from the apartment, and does not stop playing the girl. For it, the diameter of the screen was small excessively so that the body of Isabella was launched. According to expert, the finding of the Institute of Criminology " it states judgment of value, something inconceivable". " The finding that I examined is inconcluso. In the last page, it has only some consideracoes. It is a aggression to criminology" , it affirmed.